Reflection on Project 3 Draft

In this post, I will reflect on the project 3 draft peer review assignment.

Hampel, Matt. "EDIT>". 10/04/2008 via Flickr. Attribution 2.0 Generic License. 

I peer reviewed Mira and Swati's Project 3 Drafts.

• Who reviewed your Project 3 rough draft?
• Swati and Chloe reviewed my Project 3 Draft.
• What did you think and/or feel about the feedback you received? Be explicit and clear. Tell me what helped or what confused you about the feedback you got.
• The feedback was helpful and accurate. This week, I was more focused on getting things written rather than forming an opinion, so I will definitely be adding a lot to my draft before I turn it in. A lot of the feedback addressed the things I felt about my own writing, so it was nice to see that other people felt the same. It all helped, anyway, and gave some specific things to fix. 
• What aspects of Project 3 need to most work going forward [Audience, Purpose, Argumentation, or Genre? How do you plan on addressing these areas? 
• I plan to do a lot of editing on everything before I turn in a final copy. I am most concerned about changing my writing to reflect my position on the subject of research, which I am in support of. I think the remaining components will fall into place when I do that, so I am less concerned about the other aspects. 
• How are you feeling overall about the direction of your project after peer review and/or instructor conferences this week?
• I feel good. Most of the feedback I received was well-deserved, and I think the final copy will be great. I have a lot of editing to do, but I was expecting that coming into this deadline.